"In recession-plagued 2009, when teaching became a safe harbor for graduates unsure about the best career path, more than 35,000 people applied to TFA, including 11 percent of Ivy League graduates. TFA placed about 4,000 new members in 2009, bringing its corps to 7,300 teachers in 35 regions." (Miner, pg. 2)
First off, it amazes me that 11% of Ivy League graduates are applying to TFA. I would assume that graduates that spent as much as they did on their education would have higher paying jobs than TFA and have more prestigious jobs lined up for them upon graduation. I guess that's my stereotypes talking... And second, I find it odd and insulting that children in TFA schools are being taught by teachers that went to a five week summer training program. Where is their certification? Where is their experience? I know that teaching takes time, and it does require trial and error in order to establish a steady teaching style that works. Wouldn't you say it's a disservice to children when they're being taught by people straight out of college with no experience for two years and then they're gone? I find it strange.
"Harris believes it is important to commit to the classroom beyond two years, and hopes to stay at least five. Her five-year plan also includes a master’s degree in education, a master’s in education administration, and then law school. And TFA will help make Harris’ career dreams become reality." (Miner, pg. 3)
Wow, that is a really admirable plan. Reading about the philosophy of TFA and the things they wish to accomplish, it seems appropriate that Harris would propose such guidelines. As Diamond noted in another one of our readings, the students are not being taught the material as well as they could because the teacher is learning to teach versus actually teaching. One of the authors of our readings stated that TFA is considered a movement, and is helping address inequalities within our nation. I find it a bit of a stretch that Harris wants people to go to law school but with further analysis, she proposes it for good reason on the basis of civil rights. I like how Harris wants to extend the period of time TFA teachers stay with the corporation and I find it extremely important that a master's in education is required. With qualified teachers TFA may be able to make a considerable difference.
"Children in Finland only start main school at age seven. The idea is that before then they learn best when they're playing and by the time they finally get to school they are keen to start learning. Less is more." (Burridge)
I really enjoy this particular part of this article. As I have told you over this blog I am taking English 270, "Dramatic Enactment", a course in which students learn through the arts and drama. Children learn about their surroundings, themselves, their peers, and development strong group skills through play. I like the idea that children don't start school until an older age because they are able to focus on themselves and have fun when they're young. Children are curious. By starting school at age 7 I feel they can explore life on their own for a while and then they can be guided in learning on a more formal level. I'd like to adapt this sort of educational system because like they say, less IS more.
I agree with you in that the TFA program is allowing people to teach without certifications. I personally believe TFA is a joke and a slap in the face for education. However on the flip side you can teach at private schools without certifications either and some students would argue that the education they receive there is much more superior to the education you would receive at a public school. While I know i am trying to compare apples and oranges I was just pointing out that neither requires certifications, but I do agree that TFA is stupid and that you can't learn to teach in five weeks.
ReplyDeleteI think that TFA has a number of good ideas behind it...yet, students aren't getting the support and education that they need. I like the idea that TFA teachers are able to design their curriculum around state standards alone because it allows teachers to find something the kids can have fun with and relate to. You could use a creative drama approach to this method of teaching right? Engage your students right? Is it just me or are there some positives about TFA?
ReplyDeleteI agree with you that there are some positive aspects of TFA. I like the fact that they do have flexibility with creating their curriculums. I however just question whether or not they are properly prepared for teaching. I find it hard to cram what you learn in 2 years into 5 weeks.
ReplyDeleteI see your point. It takes much longer than 5 weeks to master the art of teaching.
ReplyDelete